Chapter Title
Appendix
A. Tentative Construction Programme
Appendix
B. Project Organization
Appendix
C. Environmental Mitigation Measures- Implementation Status
On 3 May 2013, Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was
commissioned by the Drainage Services Department (DSD) under Agreement No. SP
05/2012 to undertake the Independent Checker (IC) services for the Sewerage
Works at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen
(The Project).
The
Environmental Permit (EP) No.
EP- 435/2011 for the “Sewerage Works at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen” was granted by the Environmental Protection
Department (EPD) on 20 December 2011. The construction works was carried out
Welcome Construction Co Ltd. (the Contractor), commenced on 26 August
2013.
In accordance with Section 5.1 and 5.3 of the Brief for
the Project and Condition 2.2 of the EP, a Monthly Environmental Audit Report shall
be prepared and submitted at monthly intervals to confirm in writing the full
implementation of the mitigation measures recommended in the Project Profile
(PP) (Register No. PP- 454/ 2011) during and upon completion
of the construction works.
When construction of the sewerage works at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen commenced,
objections from the local residents were encountered. Therefore, the sewerage
works were temporarily suspended. DSD arranged meetings with the local
residents and tried to resolve the objections. However, there were still
majority amongst the local residents showing their objections to the proposed
works in a meeting held on 18 January 2014. In March 2014, DSD and the client
office SIG of EPD decided to curtail the proposed sewerage works at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen from the
construction contract.
Regarding the sewerage work on University Road, some
sewer alignments were revised subject to actual condition. Therefore, DSD
submitted the application for variation of environmental permit for the sewerage
works at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen
to EPD on 16 July 2014 and the amended Environmental Permit (No. EP-435/2011/A)
was issued by EPD to DSD on 29 July 2014.
This is the 31th Monthly Environmental Audit
Report covering the period from 1 June 2016 and 30 July 2016 (the reporting
month).
The
construction work programme of the Project is provided in Appendix
A. A layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1.1.
·
Trenchless
excavation for pipe laying works at the verge of the footpath of University
Road.
The organisation chart and lines of
communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure
together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix
B.
The environmental site audit was
conducted on 23 June 2016 during this reporting month. The checklist of implementation status of the
environmental mitigation measures is provided in Appendix
C.
The
environmental site audit was conducted on 23 June 2016 during this reporting
month. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and
passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation
measures where necessary. The key observations from site inspection and
associated recommendations are summarized in in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations
Inspection date |
Key Observations and Recommendations
(Date) |
Close-out
(Date) |
26 May
16 |
The contractor was reminded to provide
proper drip trip to prevent any oil leakage. |
On-going |
26 May
16 |
The contractor was reminded to remove any
construction material close to existing tree. |
On-going |
23 June
16 |
The oil leakage was observed. The
contractor was reminded to clear contaminated soil on site |
On-going |
23 June
16 |
Improper water tank setup was observed. The
contractor was reminded to setup the water tank properly |
On-going |
23 June
16 |
Muddy water tank filter was observed. The
contractor was reminded to clean the filter to ensure efficacy of water tank
process. |
On-going |
The Contractor has been applied for a bill
account for disposal. No waste was disposed of in this reporting month.
The waste flow table is present in Appendix
D.
The environmental permits, licenses, and/or
notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid
during the period is summarised in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits
Statutory Reference |
Description |
Permit
/Reference No. |
Status |
EIAO |
Environmental
Permit |
EP- 435/2011 |
Valid |
APCO |
Notification of Construction
Work under APCO |
355015 |
Valid |
WPCO |
Discharge
License |
WT00016437-2013 |
Valid |
|
Discharge
License |
WT00016957-2013 |
Valid |
WDO |
Bill Account for disposal |
7016760 |
Valid |
Legend: EIAO – Environmental Impact Assessment
Ordinance
APCO
– Air Pollution Control Ordinance
WPCO
– Water Pollution Control Ordinance
WDO
– Waste Disposal Ordinance
No environmental complaint
was received this month. The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided
in Appendix E.
No notifications of summons or successful prosecution
were received this month. The cumulative statistics on
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix
E.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The major site
works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
¡ Trenchless excavation for pipe laying works
at the verge of the footpath of University Road
Key issues to be
considered in the coming month include:
¡ Generation of dust from construction and
demolition works;
¡ Noise impact from operating equipment and
machinery on-site;
¡ Generation of site surface runoffs and
wastewater from activities on-site;
¡ Management of stockpiles and slopes,
particularly on rainy days;
¡ Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of
general refuse and construction waste; and
¡ Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil
spillage on-site.
Site audit was conducted on 23 June 2016. Recommendations on remedial
actions were given to the Contractors for the deficiencies identified during
the site audit.
No complaint, notification of summons and prosecution was received in
the reporting month.
The Contractor was reminded to maintain noise, air quality, water
quality and waste management mitigation measures and also continuously implements
all environmental mitigation measures in accordance with the PP.
Appendix B. Project Organization
|
Company /
Department |
Position |
Name |
Telephone /
Mobile |
Drainage Services Department |
Project
Proponent |
Mr
Justin Wan |
2594 7581 |
Black &
Veatch Hong Kong Limited |
Engineer’s
Representative |
Mr Eugene Chan |
6075 8606 |
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd. |
Independent
Checker |
Mr Gary Chow |
2828 5874 |
Welcome Construction Company Limited |
Site Agent |
Mr John Chan |
6051 0761 |
Welcome Construction Company Limited |
Environmental
Officer |
Mr KC Poon |
2799 8137 |
Table C1: Construction Noise – Recommended
Mitigation Measures
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
*5.2.6 |
·
Only well-maintained plant should be
operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the
construction works. |
ü |
· Machines
and plant that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work
periods or should be throttled down to a minimum. |
ü |
|
·
Plant known to emit noise strongly in one
direction, should, where possible, be orientated to direct noise away from
nearby NSRs. |
ü |
|
·
Silencers or mufflers on construction
equipment should be utilised and should be properly maintained during the
construction works. |
ü |
|
· Mobile
plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible. |
||
*5.2.2, 5.2.6 |
· Use of
temporary noise barrier, mobile barrier |
N/A |
*5.2.6 |
·
Material stockpiles and other structures
should be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise from
on-site construction activities |
ü |
*5.2.6 |
·
Noisy construction activities such as road
breaking, should be scheduled to less sensitive
hours during the day |
N/A |
*5.2.6 |
·
Liaise with the affected noise sensitive
receivers on the anticipated construction activities,
possible impacts, expected duration and
communication channel with the
project office. |
N/A |
*5.2.1,*Table 6.1 |
·
Adoption of quiet powered mechanical equipment (QPME) during
construction |
ü |
*5.2.4, ^2.3 |
·
For the sewer works located less than 15 m
away from Cheng Chek
Chee Secondary School, construction works can only be conducted after school
hours or during school breaks. For the sewer
works located between 15 m – 30 m away from the School, the contractor should liaise with the school and/or
the Examination Authority to
ascertain the exact dates and times of all examination periods and to avoid noisy construction activities during these
periods. |
N/A |
Table C2: Air Quality – Recommended Mitigation
Measures
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
*5.2.8, ^1.2 |
·
Comply with the
control measures in the Air Pollution Control (Construction dust) Ordinance. |
ü |
*5.2.8 |
·
Excavated dusty materials should be covered
by impervious sheeting or sprayed with water to keep the entire surface wet. |
ü |
*5.2.8 |
·
Use of regular watering, with complete
coverage, to reduce dust emissions from exposed site surfaces and unpaved
roads, particularly during dry weather. |
ü |
Table C3: Water Quality – Recommended Mitigation
Measures
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
*5.2.10, * Table 6.1 |
·
Follow the
guidelines in ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site
Drainage”. |
|
·
Silt removal facilities should be provided according to the guidelines
stipulated in EPD’s ProPECC PN 1/94. |
N/A |
|
· Cover
open stockpiles of construction materials with tarpaulin or similar fabric
during rainstorms. |
ü |
|
ProPECC PN 1/94 |
· Water
to be pumped out from trenches or foundation excavations shall be discharged
into storm drains via silt removal facilities. |
P |
ProPECC PN 1/94 |
· Wash-water
should have sand and silt settled out and removed at least on a weekly basis
to ensure efficiency of process. |
P |
ProPECC PN 1/94 |
· Oils
and fuels should be stored in designated areas, and the fuel tanks and
storage areas should have locks and be sited on sealed areas, within bunds of
a capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the largest tank. |
P |
Table C4: Waste Management – Recommended
Mitigation Measures
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
*5.2.12, *Table 6.1 |
·
Sort all C&D materials and waste into different
categories for reuse on site, recycling and disposal at designated public
fill reception facilities or landfills. |
N/A |
·
C&D material and excavated materials should
be reused on-site as fill material as far as possible. |
ü |
|
·
Disposal of
C&D materials should be managed through the trip ticket system for
disposal of C&D materials. |
ü |
|
*5.2.12 |
·
All Chemical
waste should be handled, stored and disposed of in
accordance with the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation. |
ü |
Table C5: Landscape and Visual Impact – Recommended Mitigation Measures
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
*5.2.14, *Table 6.2 |
·
Retain and protect existing trees near
works site. |
P |
·
Erect site hoarding compatible with the
surrounding environment for the pumping station works area |
N/A |
|
·
Maintain site cleanliness and tidiness in
accordance with the requirements stipulated in DEVB TCW No. 8/2010. |
ü |
|
·
Properly manage construction waste in the
works area. |
ü |
|
·
Minimize the number and size of temporary
works area. |
ü |
|
·
Promptly reinstate each section of the
trench upon completion of the sewer works. |
N/A |
|
·
Control of night-time security lightning to
minimize night-time glare to nearby village. |
N/A |
Table C6: Others
* PP / ^ EP ref: |
Recommended measures |
Implementation Status |
^1.5 |
·
A copy of the valid Environmental Permit
shall be displayed conspicuously on the Project site(s) at all vehicular site
entrances/exits or at a convenient location for public information at all
times. The most updated information about the Permit, including any amended
Permit, shall be displayed at such locations. If the Permit Holder surrenders
a part or whole of the Permit, the notice he send to the Director shall also
be displayed at the same locations as the original Permit. The suspended,
varied or cancelled Permit shall be removed from display at the Project
site(s). |
ü |
n/a |
·
The required licenses should be obtained
by the Contractor (including CNP (if any), WPCO license, etc.) |
ü |
Legend:
ü Implemented
× Not implemented
P Partially
implemented
N/A Not
applicable
N/O
Not observed
Cumulative statistics for
complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for the
Project account for period starting from the date of commencement of
construction works (i.e. 26 August 2013) to the end of the reporting month and are summarized
in the Table E1 below.
Table E1: Statistics
for complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions
Reporting Period |
Cumulative Statistics |
||
|
Complaints |
Notifications of summons |
Successful prosecutions |
This
reporting month |
0 |
0 |
0 |
From 26 August 2013
to end of the reporting month |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|